26022025 photo DAVID UNWIN / THE POST Restore Passenger Rail protestors appear in Wellington District Court. Defendant Thomas Brydone Taptiklis, 44. Photo: The Post/David Unwin
A protester agitating for climate change action feels no joy after the Crown abandoned the prosecution of more than 20 defendants, including his own, in the Wellington District Court.
The Crown confirmed on Tuesday that it would no longer pursue a retrial of three defendants on charges of endangering transport and that it would also drop a further six trials related to protests under the banner of Restore Passenger Rail in 2022 and 2023.
The jurors in the first trial couldn't reach an agreement on whether the protests carried an unreasonable risk to the public.
Now, the Crown said any future trials would face the same issue and it was not in the public interest to continue.
Protesters brought rush-hour traffic to a halt in Wellington when they staged sit downs and stuck their hands to the road, abseiled above Mount Victoria tunnel and hung banners from gantries above State Highway 1.
Some defendants were discharged without conviction, while others await sentencing on guilty pleas - however, most of the charges were dismissed.
The trial for Andrew Sutherland, Michael Apathy, Thomas Taptiklis, and Te Wehi Ratana began on 26 February.
All four faced charges of endangering transport, with a maximum penalty of 14 years in prison.
After more than three days of deliberation, Sutherland was acquitted on 10 March - a day later, the jury was dismissed and a retrial ordered after jurors were unable to reach a verdict for the other three defendants.
The Crown has now abandoned the retrial and a further six trials for other defendants.
However, Thomas Taptikilis said it was far from a personal triumph.
"The climate is worse than ever. There's no going on with my life and being happy.
"I'm sad that it feels like we have to go to such lengths to try to get adequate action and we haven't remotely got [it] ... so, I can't say I feel any joy about this."
He said he hoped it set a precedent and that protesters would not face prosecution for future climate change activism.
Te Wehi Ratana said while the issue of climate change hadn't gone away, the result was a vindication.
"When the jury was given all the facts, and the evidence from our two expert scientists - who made it very clear what was going on - the jury were unable to convict us and say what we did was unreasonable.
"Because what we did was reasonable within the context of the climate crisis."
In a memorandum to the court, Crown prosecutors said it was clear that the jury became deadlocked on the issue of whether the risk each defendant took was unreasonable across three protests in 2022.
"Given the way the trial developed, and the issue on which the jury became deadlocked, the Crown does not consider a re-trial is in the public interest.
"Similarly, the remaining six prosecutions would have the same issue. The Crown does not consider that continuing with those prosecutions is in the public interest."
Four defendants had charges dismissed without conviction, while six pleaded guilty to lesser charges.
Sutherland and Taptiklis pleaded guilty to wilful damage charges and await sentencing.
Defendants whose charges were also dismissed include; Rachael Mary Andrews, Susan Melanie Boyde, James Louis Cockle, Carrillon Dawn Cowan, Jill Jackson, Timothy Richard Musson, Anne Margueretta Smith, John Wilson Tovey, Dominic James Grose, Alex Sidney Jacobsen, Jenniffer Mary Olsen, Alex Harry, Gregor Morgan, Kaile Quian, Caroline Rousseau Sheldon-Williams, Julian John Warmington, Jenny Whittington, Rosemary Anne Penwarden, Alexander Henry Cockle and Joanne Kathleen Sutherland.
